Crew sickness is not an extraordinary circumstance

Updated

Your flight was cancelled or hours late because "a crew member fell ill" or "the crew ran out of hours", and the airline refused compensation. Since 2023 the law on this is clear, and it is on your side.

What the courts say

In Joined Cases TAP Portugal C-156/22 to C-158/22 (11 May 2023), the EU Court of Justice looked at a co-pilot who died suddenly shortly before departure. Even that was not an extraordinary circumstance. Planning crew, including for illness and absence, is part of an airline's normal operations.

So if one pilot or cabin crew member fell ill, at home base or away from it, the airline cannot use it to refuse compensation under EU261.

Nordic practice

When the airline may still win

What evidence to ask for

Step by step

  1. Reply in writing. Cite TAP Portugal C-156/22 to C-158/22 and ask for the documents.
  2. Wait about 4 weeks in Sweden and Norway, 6 weeks in Denmark.
  3. Board for the country where the disruption happened. Finland: KRIL, after KKV or ECC Finland; EU261 cases can be filed in English. Sweden: ARN, 150 kr. Denmark: Trafikstyrelsen with MitID. Norway: Transportklagenemnda via www.reiselivsforum.no, Norwegian or English. See the Nordic complaint boards.
  4. Court if the airline does not follow the decision.

When it is worth it, and when not

Strong: a single sick pilot or cabin crew member, at base or away, and crew hours that ran out after a delay the airline caused or cannot document.

Weaker: a sickness wave hitting large numbers of crew at once, or crew stranded by documented weather where you were rebooked quickly.

Appeal My Flight writes the reply and the board complaint for €29 per booking. You send it yourself and keep the payout.

More on the general rule: extraordinary circumstances.

FAQ

The crew member fell ill abroad, not at home base. Does that change anything?

No. In the Swedish case above the pilot fell ill at an outstation, and in the Finnish Berlin case there was no reserve crew there. The passengers won both.

The airline says it was a "safety decision". Is that different?

No. Flying only with a full, rested crew is a legal requirement. The question is why the airline had no crew to cover.

What about strikes disguised as sick days?

A mass "sick-out" by the airline's own staff is not extraordinary either (Krüsemann C-195/17). See strikes.